Talk:Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting 3rd edition

From Forgotten Realms Wiki

[edit] Article for Improvement (September 06)

So are we keeping Forgotten Realms as a redirect here or are we creating a seperate article? Although either title is interchangeable for the setting itself, FRCS is the only suitable one for the book. The question is: Do we create the article for the setting? hash

I'm suddenly in my weariness being that its nearly 1:00 AM wondering why we're doing an article on Forgotten Realms. This entire thing is supposed to be Forgotten Realms, isn't it? Yes, wisdom comes when you can barely keep your eyes open. teeheheeeee! --Elessar 04:41, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The point would be to have a quick-overview page that shortly describes the Realms (and links to more detailed pages about given topics), sort of an introduction to people who don't know the realms in depth Zerak-Tul 16:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Might also be an idea to put a link to the Web errata and mention it as well 124.254.88.41 06:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 4th edition?

Son of a bitch, are you serious!?! Please excuse the language but this is seriously irritating. 2nd edition lasted from what, '88/'89 to 2001, then we get a great 7 years out of 3rd and 3.5 edition? Just when I got used to the 3.5 edition and finally accepted all the things that are wrong with nearly hundreds of prestige classes and attacks of opportunity they announce this? I'm sorry but I just read about this now and needed to vent. Johnnyriot999 13:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)