I have removed the cleanup template. I am not sure why it was there, but it was hiding at the bottom of the page. The article doesn't seem to need cleaning up! Fw190a8 17:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- the revision that was flagged for cleanup looked like this , from December 21st. Zerak talk 20:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ooh, ugly! I guess whoever cleaned it up just didn't remove the template. All is well and good with the article now though. Fw190a8 22:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Because the "Notes" section is not considered canon (minus the wand of orcus part, which should be in that article) does anyone disagree that it should be deleted. Also, while her histroy is somewhat convuluted, I think it was very well articulated here  in the Tchazzar article, and that should be used in this one to replace the speculative suggestions by Faiths and Avatars.
P.S. If anyone disagrees with the deletion of the reference to the cartoon show, PLEASE tell me what you see in it! ; ) Johnnyriot999 07:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
In which sourcebook is the relationship between Tiamat/ Bahamut and their Untheric aspects described in detail? "Dragons of Faerûn" isn´t very explicit. — User talk:188.8.131.52
- Unknown User, for old skool info, check out Monster Mythology page 105-107... or 108 of the Faiths and Pantheons sourcebook, but there appears to be nothing about Bahamut only Tiamat :( ... thanks for adding to wiki, BTW... please include sources and pages... and create a profile :) Darkwynters (talk) 18:54, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! I promise I´ll do better next time. — User talk:184.108.40.206